Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
No, the evolutionist wants to pretend that micro-evolution is Macro-evolution.

Nope. Micro-evolution is change below the species level, macro-evolution is change above. It is clearly defined.

When a fish turns into a Reptile, or a Reptile into a Mammal, then you have Macro-evolution.

And also when one species of reptile turns into another species of reptile you also have macro-evolution.

Is the Salamander still a reptile?

There are about 500 species of salamander. In fact there are 10 different families of salamander.

So do you believe one species of salamander turning into another species of salamander is possible? Is this an example of micro or macroevolution?

Is one family of salamander turning into another family of salamander possible in your opinion? Is this an example of micro or macroevolution?

Do you accept that all salamanders could share a common ancestor and can be derived by darwinian evolution?

315 posted on 09/02/2005 5:21:51 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]


To: bobdsmith
No, the evolutionist wants to pretend that micro-evolution is Macro-evolution. Nope. Micro-evolution is change below the species level, macro-evolution is change above. It is clearly defined.

No, Macro-evolution is changing single cell to human.

At least in turns of a theory trying to explain where man came from .

When a fish turns into a Reptile, or a Reptile into a Mammal, then you have Macro-evolution. And also when one species of reptile turns into another species of reptile you also have macro-evolution.

Not if the reptile is still a reptile.

Unless you are just playing word games.

Is the Salamander still a reptile? There are about 500 species of salamander. In fact there are 10 different families of salamander.

Is it a reptile?

So do you believe one species of salamander turning into another species of salamander is possible? Is this an example of micro or macroevolution? Is one family of salamander turning into another family of salamander possible in your opinion? Is this an example of micro or macroevolution?

If it is still a reptile then it is a example of micro-evolution, not Macro, at least not in the sense that Darwanian evolution is attempting to allege that man came about, from single cell to man.

Do you accept that all salamanders could share a common ancestor and can be derived by darwinian evolution?

Salamanders share the common ancestor of reptiles and that is what they will remain.

That is not Darwinian evolution.

Man has the common ancestor of Adam and Eve.

324 posted on 09/05/2005 12:20:03 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Gal.4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson