[js1138]

Your post is rather redundant, because we on the evo side have been saying for years the there is nothing new in Behe.

Behe's book, almost word for word, was published in 1802. The argument was old then, as you have pointed out.

This would explain why Darwin's Origin is written explicitely to answer this line of thought. Origin takes each and everry argument posed by William Paley in 1802, and counters it.

The rebuttal has yet to be published. Current ID theory is just a paraphrase of Paley.

[Heartlander]

Are you stating that ID is a theory that can be proven?

Evolving the Bacterial Flagellum Through Mutation and Cooption

Evolving the Bacterial Flagellum Through Mutation and Cooption: Part II

Evolving the Bacterial Flagellum Through Mutation and Cooption: Part III

Evolving the Bacterial Flagellum Through Mutation and Cooption: Part IV