The author of this article reasoned in circular logic (what the accuses the id'ers of doing by stating that they come at the scientific evidence with bias, and then inject religion (what the evolutionists are inferring is myth by either intentionally or on purpose by saying it this way..), when in reality he never attacks id on its merits or scientific grounds, he simply say "id=religion" so don't believe it! Really many id'ers do believe in id based on scientific evidence/observation. It's really a CHEAP shot, and shows a lack of faith in their own stance. IF you want to debate evolution v creation v id then fine do it based on facts and the search to find the truth, but most evolutionists I have found won't do this (especially in the media). Evolutionists in meadia find it easy to discredit an opponent by CHEAP tactics using political arguments ala the talk shows, but on issues based so much upon facts and not so much politics it just makes then sound silly (OF COURSE ACTUALLY ARGUING POINTS WOULD BE PLAYING FAIR IN THE ORIGINS DEBATE, something LIBERALS rarely do, and I doubt they will anytime soon on this debate)!! :)I my self am a CREATIONIST because I believe that the world wide flood existed and covered all mountains even (there is evidence that the Bible is based on fact, and scientists have found seashells on top of very high mountains :)!).
"I my self am a CREATIONIST because I believe that the world wide flood existed and covered all mountains even (there is evidence that the Bible is based on fact, and scientists have found seashells on top of very high mountains :)!"
This reminds me of the dismissed juror from the O.J. Simpson trial who asked his opinion of the DNA evidence implicating O.J. said "a lot of people have the same blood type."
Since it is a FACT that the continents drift and force the mountains up, that has to be the stupidest statement yet on this thread.