Sounds like doublespeak to me. So he agrees with Bush's approach to Iraq, and only offers a vague "we need a strategy" as his platform? Typical BS, we've heard it before.
As we have from every other politician sitting in Washington. So what's the difference? Starting to hear the same from even Republicans these days.
What? You don't think we need a strategy? Changing the storyline of exactly what US armed forces are doing over there every few months doesn't seem to be working well as a strategy. May as well try something different.
Agree. Sounds like the guy in Ohio.