"I support the poor but not the war on poverty."

8.25.05 | JohnLongIsland, Mia T

[nmh]

Thanks for posting.

You did allot of work.

I will be reading through all of it.

Have a great day!

[Mia T]

ping

[Sam Cree]

Cute phrase!

[Mia T]

I thought it was great. It's JohnLongIsland's creation.

[Mia T]

You too! thanx :)

[andyandval]

No blood for Burgers!

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

bump

[Jet Jaguar]

BTTT!

[the tongue]

No blood for olive oil!!

[.cnI redruM]

Bill Clinton, like a lot of The Left, loves the poor when they're far away and a theoretical concept. However, there are probably very few Conservative Christians on The New London, CN Town Council and we all saw how the Clinton SCOTUS Appointees voted on Kilo v. New London.

[Eagle of Liberty]

Had an analogy while I was listening to a lady on Hannity trying to explain that we have spent so much already on Border Control and none of it is helping. She actually said that since it is not helping, we should just stop spending the money.

My analogy would be this: We have also spent a lot on the homeless and the problem just isn't getting any better. We should just stop.

[bmwcyle]

bttt---The Clinton threat still looms.

[mc5cents]

I support drugs but not the war on drugs!

[beyond the sea]

The group will strategize on the best methods to reduce poverty; use religion as a force for reconciliation and conflict resolution

"use religion as a force for reconciliation and conflict resolution" --- tell that to the Islamists.

[JohnLongIsland]

the best thing about these bashes is they all get
doggie bags worth about $10000-$12000 to take home with them with gifts donated from tiffanys, coach, rayban, etc.
It's a great advertising gimmic
I could see mr. bill going to africa and telling some kid:
"here kid put some salt and pepper on my rolex and eat it."

[TBP]

We declared war on poverty; poverty won.

That's two wars LBJ lost for us.

[Mia T]

 

 

 

No blood for olive oil!!--the tongue

bump!

OIL FOR BLOOD
(IT WAS NOT 'GOING TO WAR WITH IRAQ' THAT WAS 'ALL ABOUT OIL,' BUT RATHER, 'NOT GOING TO WAR WITH IRAQ')

by Mia T, 12.08.04

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic

pourquoi la gauche est dangereuse pour l'Amérique

 

by Mia T, 5.15.04

 

 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

 

 

 

As long as you've got a rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag.

Elizabeth Rickard

 

 

 

The $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food program was by far the largest relief operation in the history of the United Nations. By extension, it's rapidly becoming the U.N.'s largest-ever scandal....

Those included rewarding friends and allies world-wide with oil allocations on very favorable terms, as well as extracting large kickbacks from oil traders and suppliers of humanitarian goods....

There can be little doubt that U.N. mismanagement contributed greatly to the negative perception of the anti-Saddam containment policy. There is also little doubt that the reward and kickback scheme--as well the possibility of exposure--was a factor as some countries weighed whether to back U.S.-led regime change in Iraq. There is even reason to suspect that some of the Saddam friends and allies who benefited may have been members of the U.N. Secretariat.

Oil for Scandal
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:01 a.m.

 

eave it to the French to make pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic all the rage.

They and their moneygrubbing, Oil-for-Food defrauding cohorts abroad, and their power-hungry would-be terrorist sympathizers here, are all sporting "THE LOOK."

(How many of those oh so trendy Kerry-clinton-Kennedy hate-America, blame-America-first sound bites will Al-Jazeera broadcast today?)

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.