Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/25/2005 5:03:15 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: conservativecorner

Any chance they could inbreed themselves out of existance?????

Just wishin'!!


2 posted on 08/25/2005 5:07:05 AM PDT by liberateUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
About 40 percent of Muslim and Druze women and 70 percent of Bedouin women in the region were found to be married to first- or second-degree relatives.

Ahhh..
the West Virginia sect.

3 posted on 08/25/2005 5:07:54 AM PDT by evad ( PC KILLS..and so do liberal judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

"About 40 percent of Muslim and Druze women and 70 percent of Bedouin women in the region were found to be married to first- or second-degree relatives."

You don't say?


4 posted on 08/25/2005 5:08:16 AM PDT by Gefreiter ("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

About 40 percent of Muslim and Druze women and 70 percent of Bedouin women in the region were found to be married to first- or second-degree relatives.



eeeeewwwwwwww ..... a real kiss your sister moment ...


5 posted on 08/25/2005 5:09:07 AM PDT by THEUPMAN (#### comment deleted by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

"The program emphasizes the fact that consanguineous marriage is in no way mandated by Islam. Rooted in ancient custom, consanguinity is nonetheless widespread in the Arab world; for example, a 1989 study in Iraq found 53 percent of the subjects to be consanguineously married."

Ah, so they don't have to marry their relatives - they just like to. That is totally gross.


6 posted on 08/25/2005 5:10:33 AM PDT by LibSnubber (liberal democrats are domestic terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

btttt

Clans love inbreeding. It strengthens them. aside from the genetic defects. It strengthens clan solidarity and common purpose.

Arabs are very tribal so this works out great for them


7 posted on 08/25/2005 5:25:35 AM PDT by dennisw (Muhammad was a successful Hitler. Hitler killed too many people too fast - L. Auster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

First cousin marriage is not so bad in isolation. But when done over generations it compounds itself and makes for genetic defects. Allah FUBAR!!


8 posted on 08/25/2005 5:27:00 AM PDT by dennisw (Muhammad was a successful Hitler. Hitler killed too many people too fast - L. Auster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Explains so much.


9 posted on 08/25/2005 5:27:10 AM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Gee, now the Arabs will have another excuse to want to annihilate the Jews.


10 posted on 08/25/2005 5:27:59 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

A real Sheik Ned Al Beatty Moment.


11 posted on 08/25/2005 5:29:19 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
New Anti-terrorism Measure: Banjos for Bedouins.

13 posted on 08/25/2005 5:32:44 AM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Yes, but...up until say a thousand years ago wouldn't all people everywhere be marrying more-or-less close genetic relatives?

People weren't very mobile until recently.


14 posted on 08/25/2005 5:38:36 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Hey, when your "religion" is open to any interpretation you please to allow you to have your way with Sis, then toss her as your "honor killing" stabbing post as part of your religion's legal arm (sharia) while providing your "religion" with a fresh, chromosome shy future suicide bomber for the cause...I mean, it doesn't get any better than that, does it?


15 posted on 08/25/2005 5:43:24 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

So basically this article says that many arabs are crazy, and will continue to produce crazy off-spring. Osama must be just giddy.


16 posted on 08/25/2005 5:48:51 AM PDT by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
All the women look alike in their burkas, but after reading this article I'm thinking they probably all look alike even when they take the burkas off.
20 posted on 08/25/2005 6:03:45 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner; All
"............Just as modern medicine recognizes genetic sources of many physical illnesses, modern psychology recognizes genetic components in many psychological problems including criminality. Presumably, a region where inbreeding is rife—and reinforced through successive generations—should also have a greater frequency of such mental ailments. Though, not surprisingly, there seem to have been no studies in that regard given the delicacy of the subject, the high levels of social pathology, violence, and terrorism in the Arab world suggest that inbreeding is one of the causes.

OK,. So take a religion like Islam, mix well with continual genetically reproductive induced mental illnesses (insanity, borderline personality disorders, OCD, manic depression, bipolar, etc., etc.) and what has the world received? You got it!! Global terrorism.

Believe it or not, back in the '70's with the Israeli war, Palestinian protests, hijackings, bombings, etc., I told several people in college, friends, relatives to take note of the look in most of the Arabs eyes and watch and listen to what they say and do, and you would see that there was something seriously wrong with them as a people. I could never determine if it were a loss of spirituality, loss of purpose, pure hatred, simple insainity, or all of it wrapped into one head. Didn't matter, whatever I saw and still see, it is there. I stood by that comment then, and I stand by it now.

Why is it that the educated Arabs and Persians and clerics for the last 50 years have not brought this out to their own people that crossing blood lines 1st and 2nd degree was not healthy for animals and that includes humans?

Of course some would say I'm racist with such statements, but, that would be akin that parent/child incest is OK too, well, at least speaking from a mental aspect. BTW, there're some Westerners too that carry that look for whatever the cause(s).

22 posted on 08/25/2005 6:06:15 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
A history lesson from the bible: if you follow the tree of Adam and Eve all the way to Abraham and Sarah, inbreeding was quite common. God promised Abraham a son, but by age 75 Sarah still was barren. Abraham has Ishmael with Hagar at 90 years old.
Muslims claim the first born son, Ishmael, was an apostle and prophet, and was the legitimate successor. Christians and Jews believe it can only be the son resulting from conception within the marriage, or Isaac. Jews believe further that their divine message comes not only from Isaac, but from Isaac's son Jacob.
According to all 3 scriptures (the Bible, the Koran and the Holy Scriptures of Judaism), God calls upon Abraham to sacrifice his son as the greatest test of faith. However, in the Christian and Jewish Bibles, the son chosen to sacrifice was Isaac. Muslims believe it was Ishmael. (Note: Neither son was actually sacrificed because God was just practicing a cruel test. In the end, a ram was sacrificed.)
From these original family feuds, the division between the religions continued to deepen. Christians follow the teachings of Moses, Jesus and Abraham. In Islamic religion, Muslims believe the Prophet Muhammad in the seventh century carried the true word. They believed the teachings of Moses and Jesus to be distortions of the truth for which Muhammad was the remedy. Jews continued their split from Christianity by not accepting the divinity of Jesus as "the son of God". They believe God is spiritual, not flesh, and has no human attributes. Jews also do not believe in original sin nor heaven and hell.

"Again, it is amazing that the hatred and violence we see today between Muslims, Christians and Jews were born of the same teachings from a man called Abraham."

And all 3 essentially believe in the same God!

http://www.ethicalatheist.com/docs/three_religions.html
23 posted on 08/25/2005 6:08:57 AM PDT by mosquitobite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

I can see where such practices would cut down on marital arguments about the in-laws. But you couldn't say to your kids --"You must get that from your Mom's side of the family!"


26 posted on 08/25/2005 6:12:19 AM PDT by metalcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
These rates being generally twice as high among Israeli Arabs as among Israeli Jews, by 2002 an Israeli health program launched in the late 1980s had lowered the rate among Western Galilee Arabs to about 1.5 that of the Jews in the area.

Wow. No matter how they are treated by the Arab world, the Jews still try to help them. That says a lot.

37 posted on 08/25/2005 8:11:34 AM PDT by technochick99 (firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson