Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative Firster
Thanks for the post. This coming change, as much as I HATE to say this, appears irreversible. Frankly, I am not completely against it AS LONG AS the USA maintains its status as the leader and dictates most of the terms of the combination. Holding the entire continent (and kicking that little SOB out of Venezuela) against communism is not a bad idea...


Of course, the major problems about all of this are the free-for-all socialism policies of the US government(and socialism-lite that is part and parcel of the current Exec/Legi branches) coupled to similar policies already in place in these other governments. We cannot support the continent in the same way we are presently supporting our own culture (which is still likely to implode from the weight of these programs). Something will have to give to make this work; my hope is that it would be 'feel good' policies that benefit no one.
I may get flamed for this, fine...I just do not see there being any stop-gap for it, so let's do it on our terms. Statehood for Canada and Mexico, with representative government for all? Not as bad an idea as it sounds...
28 posted on 08/25/2005 7:21:40 AM PDT by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amalie

The problem is, the fundamental goal of the "elites" is to destroy the Constitution and the American middle class.

We'll end up with a continent wide Mexico, and not the other way around. Go look up more of this plan. The (former)U.S. taxpayers will foot the bill for the rest of the continent, with free college for all mexicans and welfare for some sixty million more mexicans and twenty million canadians, plus we'll pay for all the new infrastructure to be built in mexico. We'll get nothing out of this but the shaft.

That will finish us off.


30 posted on 08/25/2005 7:56:48 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google CFR North American Community)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Amalie
Frankly, I am not completely against it AS LONG AS the USA maintains its status as the leader and dictates most of the terms of the combination. Holding the entire continent (and kicking that little SOB out of Venezuela) against communism is not a bad idea...

Just what makes you think the idea is to hold the place AGAINST communism? It is intended to CEMENT the control they already surreptitiously have under false colors.

31 posted on 08/25/2005 8:00:39 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Definition of strict constructionist: someone who DOESN'T hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Amalie
"..AS LONG AS the USA maintains its status.."

Aye, there's the rub, now isn't it? Aarrggh! Now what if I was to say to ye; the U.S., she won't be hav'n her own sovreignty for much longer, due to congress ceding their responsibilities to the likes of the WTO. We're in it good now, I tell ye. And only a miracle can get us out.

32 posted on 08/25/2005 8:02:11 AM PDT by Designer (Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson