Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ostlandr
You bring up an interesting point. What do today's courts do with atheists?
28 posted on 08/24/2005 4:31:37 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Michael Barnes

They affirm they will tell the truth, consonant with the US Constitution. Forcing an atheist to swera on the Bible would be a constitutional no no.


32 posted on 08/24/2005 4:33:53 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (Atheism is not conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Barnes
You bring up an interesting point. What do today's courts do with atheists?

Federal courts have never required the use of a Bible or the words "so help me God." The U.S. Constitution, every time it mentions oaths, always says "oath or affirmation." This was because, even then, there were a lot of religious dissenters (Quakers, and probably some others)who wouldn't swear on a Bible.

Today, federal law is that the witness can pretty much use any form of oath or affirmation he wants, as long as it is clear that (a) he is promising to tell the truth, and (b) he understands that he can be convicted of perjury if he lies. (The same is true in the state courts I have been in, but I have never been in a North Carolina state court, so I don't know if they really make everyone swear on a Bible.)

77 posted on 08/24/2005 5:29:58 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson