Well! You couldn't just disagree either could you? Your last post to me was NOT nice..it was a personal attack as most of your posts to me are. From the first to the last..you never try to understand where I am "coming from" you seem more interested in one-ups-manship.
Expressing thoughts in writing is difficult enough for me without being slandered by the likes of you..do you expect me to believe you were only giving an update for my benefit? That is highly unlikely.
Diatribe done.
If you truly are a Christian..your posts would suggest so..than I say we get this out of our system and start over. I've formed some good friendships in real life that have had rockier beginnings..
If Mr. Robertson can do it, so can we.
My heartfelt apologies for the misunderstanding.
Okay... fair enough. I guess your saying I support Chavez ticked me off some. That's just not the case, I assure you. I appreciate the considerate words and I do not want to attack or slander you. I'm also not interested in one-upsmanship.
I'll take responsibility for the argument going bad between us as it was me who responded to your comment first. Okay?
I think I do understand somewhat where you are coming from -- at least I'm trying to do so. I'm not as self-righteous as you might think. My problem with Pat is that he is supposed to represent Christians. He chose this as his vocation. So, from my perspective, he has a responsibility. Pastors in his church (from which he resigned before his presidential run) are just as aghast as I am that he said what he did.
That's my only argument. I understand you disagree. That's fine. I'll tone it down and hope you do the same.
You're right about seeing things in print. Emotions can be misconstrued. I was posting the link because it was an update to the story. It wasn't for your benefit but... everyone's. I was just too lazy to got to the original poster's name on the previous page.