Posted on 08/24/2005 8:59:31 AM PDT by GeorgiaYankee
Awesome letter, Cindy should read it.
Drudge is SO yesterday's news. There are at least a dozen blogs that make drudge look like warmed over oatmeal.
To bad Rush hasn't figured that out yet. I think half his stack of stuff consists of his laptop open to Drudge while he does his show.
You're right, I just get ticked off at the overly pessimistic.
Great tagline btw. I read that post and it was great. That's why I disagree with the negative thoughts.
How much does a full page ad in that local Crawford paper cost? I mean it. We should reprint it using Scott Ott as the author as an open letter to Ms. Sheehan and her supporters and sign it by the people who are paying for it. Whatdaya think? It'll be cheap, but I guarantee it'll be picked up by the National Media. At least Fox!
How much does a full page ad in that local Crawford paper cost? I mean it. We should reprint it using Scott Ott as the author as an open letter to Ms. Sheehan and her supporters and sign it by the people who are paying for it. Whatdaya think? It'll be cheap, but I guarantee it'll be picked up by the National Media. At least Fox!
He has been zapped now,but wasn't zapped when I posted my HUH.
I like playing with trolls.
If it's as a cheap as I think it will be, I will pay for it myself. If JIMROB and Scott Ott will allow, we'll sign it FREEREPUBLIC.COM. We would have to at fast, any comments?
Does anyone know how I can get in touch with Scott Ott. I'm serious. A full page ad in that horrible Iconoclast is less than $400. I will pay for it. If he retools the letter in his own hand I would like to pay to have it published as a full page ad in the Crawford paper made out of Cindy Sheehan and her supporters. But we have to act quickly. I went to Scrappleface website and couldn't find a direct email address for him. Any ideas?
OH! WHAT A RELIEF IT IS!!!
I'm mopping my eyes.
Thank you Scott Ott.
Did you read this?
I think it's a good "letter" and would love for it to be read more widely.
Don't you feel silly now? 8^)
DUH!!
Great....
Er......I would have if "scappleface" had been part of the headline in News/Activism - yet - it was not, making it appear a legimate story about a draft letter from Bush to Sheenan.
My complaint is only that people scanning the headlines in News/Activism will come away with the idea that Bush did author a letter to her. Not everybody reads each and every article they see appear in News/Activism. A disclaimer should have appeared in the headline since it was NOT NEWS but an article PRETENDING to be a letter from Bush to Sheehan.
Gee - get a grip. Or, has the mainstream media changed your view of reporting "NEWS".
What does that have to do with any of my comments?
My point was that although the letter is very good - it should not have been shown in News/Activism without the Scappleface identification as part of the title because otherwise it is misleading people that just scan the headlines.
Bush did not write a letter to Sheenan - but the headline makes it appear he did. Only if they read the comments and understand the "scappleface" source would they understand this was a "hoped" letter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.