"You are confusing "new enlistment" quotas with "reenlistments"."
Yes. I should have been clearer, but still, it seems like the overall numbers seem to fit whatever side you're on. And of course, there's the Charlie Rangel draft argument tha treaaly stirs the pot.
"it seems like the overall numbers seem to fit whatever side you're on"
"overall numbers?"
there is no "overall number" discussed.
The MSM has been reporting "new enlistments" and Michael Medved is talking about "reenlistments."
just as Michael Medved & I have noted.
The press, Charlie Rangel and the rest of the naysayers have only been talking about "new enlistments."
Medved and I are talking about "REENLISTMENTS!"
which has not been reported by the MSM.
And if you can't tell the difference then I can't help you. LOL