Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Victor
Here we go again.
"Close the bases, shrink the military, we don't need a large military."

We went through this once after Vietnam and had to regrow the military when it became obvious that shrinking it was a bad idea.

4 posted on 08/24/2005 8:27:36 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Just another Joe
"Close the bases, shrink the military, we don't need a large military."

AFAIK, this is "Close the bases and reposition the current military." Sorry, but an unneccessary base remaining open amounts to a federal welfare program for the local population.

6 posted on 08/24/2005 8:44:44 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Just another Joe
I don't know that closing the bases is shrinking our military capacity. The number of folks and the missions would be more relevant. Places like Fort Bragg and Camp Pendleton can take on significantly more numbers, while closed bases like Miramar (not on the list) would be a tremendous asset to the community.

Weren't the bases and locations designed for World War II needs. Can't we do the job with fewer locations?

11 posted on 08/24/2005 8:59:30 AM PDT by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Just another Joe

Nobody is shrinking the military, they are closing unnecessary and consolidating some bases. Where's that whiny chick from Texarkana? What does she think of this outcome?


29 posted on 08/24/2005 11:35:39 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson