Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas, Connecticut Spared Base Closings
Yahoo (AP) ^ | 8/24/05 | Liz Sidoti

Posted on 08/24/2005 8:19:50 AM PDT by The_Victor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: The_Victor

OK, I admit it -- I DON'T like the prospect of driving an extra hundred miles to use the PX at West Point, so hooray for SuBase NLon. On the other hand, 12 years ago when closing it was first proposed, we had a hundred attack boats in the fleet and six bases for them. Now we have _forty_ boats in the fleet and we're still going to have six bases. Something's wrong with this picture. The squids are going to have to sacrifice something -- perhaps something valuable that we'll wish we had some day -- in order to keep lipstick on this pig. And God help us all when EPA begins to snoop around.


21 posted on 08/24/2005 11:19:57 AM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

The purpose of bases is ultimately the defense of the country, not the creation or preservation of jobs.


22 posted on 08/24/2005 11:21:37 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: camle

So a BLUER than BLUE state (Connecticut) wants to keep a MILITARY installation that produces NUCLEAR weapons?? What hypocrites!!


23 posted on 08/24/2005 11:22:42 AM PDT by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

Excellent analysis from one of the many experts on FR. I love this board!


24 posted on 08/24/2005 11:23:50 AM PDT by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: enviros_kill

Connecticut - biting the hand that feeds it since the 60's.;-)

btw, they don't produce the weapons, just the boats.


25 posted on 08/24/2005 11:24:36 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Snickersnee
I DON'T like the prospect of driving an extra hundred miles to use the PX at West Point,...

The military should probably close all the Post Exchanges and other base stores. Instead they could provide military personnel with a tax exempt number and let you guys shop at WalMart tax free. Save both you and the government some money.

26 posted on 08/24/2005 11:27:34 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I can simply wet myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: camle

Agree - but the anti-nukes consider nuclear power and nuclear weapons to be the same thing. Just think-if the first use of electricity had been to electrocute somebody they might be still fighting to ban electrons. Their tiny brains function in that manner-one thought deep all the time.


27 posted on 08/24/2005 11:30:10 AM PDT by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

NSS


28 posted on 08/24/2005 11:31:42 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (This ain't your granddaddy's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

Nobody is shrinking the military, they are closing unnecessary and consolidating some bases. Where's that whiny chick from Texarkana? What does she think of this outcome?


29 posted on 08/24/2005 11:35:39 AM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"The military should probably close all the Post Exchanges and other base stores. Instead they could provide military personnel with a tax exempt number and let you guys shop at WalMart tax free."

WalMart has no ambience compared to AAFES/NES. And by "ambience" I mean that sign in the parking lot right outside the door that says "CSM/SGM PARKING ONLY"

30 posted on 08/24/2005 1:02:41 PM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
Image hosted by Photobucket.com don't forget working on the water in the lovely new england winters too... 8^)
31 posted on 08/24/2005 1:19:27 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Anybody know whether BRAC saved or scuttled the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard?


32 posted on 08/24/2005 1:29:51 PM PDT by piperpilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

With the horrible eminent domain decision and the arrogant New London city attitude I was actually hoping for a base closure. That would have taken the private need for the property seizures away.


33 posted on 08/24/2005 1:59:59 PM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: piperpilot

Yes they did.

Go to the Yahoo link on the initial posting. Portsmouth stays open.


34 posted on 08/24/2005 2:26:51 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Snickersnee
Image hosted by Photobucket.com And God help us all when EPA begins to snoop around.

what you said... i'll bet that played MORE than a little bit into the decission.

35 posted on 08/24/2005 2:36:53 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: camle
"btw, they don't produce the weapons, just the boats."

It's true we don't produce the nuclear weapons here but we do produce a great deal of war materiel, from the subs themselves, as mentioned, at General Dynamics, Electric Boat division to P&W Engines, to Sikorsky and Kaman Helicopters to the M-16 at Colt etc. CT has been a big part of the nations armory for a lot of years and was an A target all through the cold war.

All that said, it is still a stupid idea to keep the sub base open, tactically and strategically.

36 posted on 08/24/2005 2:49:51 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
All an enemy would have to do to bottle up a large portion of our east coast submarine force for the duration of a war would be to drop one or both of the large bridge spans into the river.

Worth repeating.

37 posted on 08/24/2005 3:41:23 PM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

BRAC votes to close Naval Station Ingleside, transfer jobs from NAS Corpus Christi(TEXAS)

http://www.caller.com/ccct/local_news/article/0,1641,CCCT_811_4026447,00.html


38 posted on 08/24/2005 5:46:55 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberals-beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
Because of the way the bottom of the ocean slopes gradually up, we were required to do a 13 hour surface transit to reach the “Dive Point”. This same transit in San Diego would take about 1 hour. This is an awful long time to be a target.

Geopolitically, too, isn't it more likely a sub out of the West Coast would be closer to a probable trouble spot than a sub out of the East Coast? If I want to go to Taiwan on the double I don't set sail from New England.

39 posted on 08/24/2005 11:48:11 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; JohnnyZ; Clintonfatigued; Kuksool; Coop; Theodore R.

Groton escaping from the Pentagon's axe saved many jobs in Connecticut, including perhaps that of Republican Congressman Rob Simmons. Along with Jim Leach's CD in Iowa, Simmons's district gave Bush his lowest 2004 percentage of any House district currently held by a Republican (44%), so Simmons doesn't have much of a margin of error in the district. But Simmons is liberal on social issues and more conservative on economic issues and foreign affairs, and works his district well, so I think he will survive once again.


40 posted on 08/26/2005 9:37:50 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson