Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim_Curtis
No, because we had declared our intent and had initiated military operations. Pat Robertson and Snottinopolus were both suggesting completely covert wet jobs, with no sanction under any standard of international conduct.
39 posted on 08/24/2005 9:58:04 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Dear Pat: A Reverend represents God, not The Godfather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: .cnI redruM
Pat Robertson and Snottinopolus were both suggesting completely covert wet jobs, with no sanction under any standard of international conduct.

If forced into a bloody war or faced with the death of your nation or way of life, you might still hold your chin up high with the knowledge that at least you followed the "standards of international conduct" on the way towards your extinction...not me though.

If the "standard of international conduct" will lead to bloody war, it is the peacemaker who doesn't abide by this standard.

"Standards of international conduct" can be put in place to empower the Hitlers and Husseins. You can count on that being the case when you have corrupt organizations like the UN devising these standards.

40 posted on 08/24/2005 10:34:51 AM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson