To: Quick1
The whole point here is simple. We have people trying to make the point that "Intelligent Design" is NOT science, it is religion masquerading as science. It's a pity they had to go reductio ad absurdium to prove the point, but CREATIONISM IS RELIGION. Teach it in Religious Studies classes. Evolution is the current scientific theory, and it should be taught in science classes.
27 posted on
08/24/2005 7:23:03 AM PDT by
Salgak
(Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
To: Salgak
The whole point here is simple. We have people trying to make the point that "Intelligent Design" is NOT science, it is religion masquerading as science. It's a pity they had to go reductio ad absurdium to prove the point, but CREATIONISM IS RELIGION. Teach it in Religious Studies classes. Evolution is the current scientific theory, and it should be taught in science classes.Stop making sense! You know damn well that calm, rational discourse is taboo on these threads!
There are only approaches allowed:
"Ladies and gentlemen! In this corner we have the religious whackjobs supporting ID (aka stealth Creationism); in that corner we have the apostate scientific doomed-to-perdition supporters of Evolution."
Unlike boxing matches, however, there's never a winner in theses bouts.
267 posted on
08/24/2005 2:31:12 PM PDT by
IonImplantGuru
("Me? You talking to me? You talkin' to me? Then [BLEEP]... Well, I'm the only one here.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson