"In fact, a strong case can be made that Bush, Rove, and Congressional Republicans had no intention to advance a domestic conservative agenda in the first place."===========================================
* * *
Bush faces GOP fight over guest workers
* * *
President Bush faces a major rebellion within his own party if he follows through on a promise to push legislation that would offer millions of illegal immigrants a path to U.S. citizenship. Almost no issue divides Republicans as deeply.
Another example is that of border security and illegal immigration.Republicans are supposed to be tough on terror, but when it comes to the thousands of miles of unprotected borders, Republicans are playing politics while the security of America is at stake.
To fight a real war on terror, government officials must make it as tough as possible for terrorists to enter the country illegally.
Yet, whenever some Republicans come forward and talk about fighting illegal immigration and increasing border security, other Republicans are backing down under fear of being called "racist" or "insensitive."
Perhaps Republican legislators need to increase the calcium in their diets so they can grow a backbone.
Instead of the image of tough legislators fighting for conservative values and issues, the images that come to mind more often than not when thinking of Republicans in Washington are those of a family of jellyfish.
Thank you for the ping. Couldn't have stated it better myself.
Agreed.
The President and the Congressional GOP have advanced an agenda that is consistent with big government Republicanism. The tax cuts were great, but federal spending on domestic social programs over the last 4-1/2 years has gone through the roof. The conservative agenda has taken a back seat. This President doesn't believe in limited government and his veto record proves it.