Posted on 08/23/2005 10:14:18 PM PDT by Mia T
solving clinton poverty
If you want to attend ex-President Clinton's upcoming conference on solving global poverty, you better not be poor yourself.
"This nonpartisan conference will bring together a diverse and select group of current and former heads of state, business leaders, noteworthy academicians, and key NGO representatives to participate in a series of dynamic interactive workshops," the web site claims.
"The group will strategize on the best methods to reduce poverty; use religion as a force for reconciliation and conflict resolution; implement new business strategies and technologies to combat climate change; and strengthen governance."
The ex-president himself - who used to say he was obsessed with getting Osama bin Laden - says he's found a new obsession.
"In my life now, I am obsessed with only two things," he now insists. "I don't want to anybody die before their time and I don't want to see good people spend their energies without making a difference."
Attendance at the CGI is supposedly by invitation only. But for those willing to pony up the $15 large, Mr. Clinton is apparently willing to make an exception.
The CGI web site notes:
"If you have not received an invitation and would like to see if you are eligible to attend, please complete this form and a representative of the event will contact you."
Clinton Charging $15,000 for Poverty Conference
|
|
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
||
|
||
|
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security? by Mia T, 8.18.05 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) thanx to jla and Wolverine for the audio
|
ping
bump
BTTT
thxs.
They actually have the balls to use that phrase? Un-effin'believable!
"Nonpartisan" in this context means that clinton will take a right-winger's 15 G's without a qualm. ;)
thx. :)
thx. :)
this is just like the concert they had last month its a big feel good do nothing bash
the MSM media should have cameras in every corner and show the whole event as it will expose the debauchery, decadence and total non regard for the poor and the poor's problems of the left. Its like i support the troops but not the war. the new leftist phrase should be:
"i support the poor but not the war on poverty."
"i support the poor but not the war on poverty." Q ERTY6ping What a great point! Your analogy exposes the speciousness, the absurdity, of the original formulation by the left-wing PR machine: And just like for the troops in the war on terror, the left actually wants--and is doing its damn hardest to cause-- the poor to lose the war on poverty. Mia T A constituency that is poor and in servitude is a must if the moribund left is to have any chance in hell of surviving, never mind, regaining power.
"I support the troops but not the war."
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude" Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex. Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense. Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
by Gail Wynand
BTTT
thanx :)
How many of the millions generated from this event will end up in Hillary's re-election coffers?
bump
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.