Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie

I may not be following your post exactly. But do you remember the first day or two of this story? The Commission first denied ever hearing about Able Danger.

They've told so many stories, it's obvious they are in cover-up mode.

There were even quotes from them, denying hearing anything about AD. Then they changed it to something else, then something else and finally have settled on that they knew about Able Danger but were never presented with info on Atta.


326 posted on 08/23/2005 5:02:29 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
This from Captain Quarters.

August 10, 2005 9/11 Commission Acknowledges Briefing On Able Danger Tomorrow's New York Times reports that members of the 9/11 Commission reversed themselves and now acknowledge being briefed on the Army's data mining project, Able Danger, prior to the publication of their report to the American people. After over 24 hours of denying that anyone had told the Commission about the secret project, their spokesman now says that commission officials met with a uniformed officer who told them about the identification of Mohammed Atta and three other 9/11 hijackers in 2000, over a year prior to the attacks:

328 posted on 08/23/2005 5:09:44 PM PDT by mware (Trollhunter of Note)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

I am just repeating what Michael Medved said. I am a mere conduit.


329 posted on 08/23/2005 5:10:47 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson