Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eastforker
Based on the laws you cited, Wal-Mart is in trouble.

Given that the guy was already in custody and immobilized, there were no longer any fears about recovery of lost items, nor any danger of harm from the perpetrator.

Given that it took 20+ minutes for this guy to die in custody, and given the responses of the guards, negligent homicide charges would seem to be justified here.

161 posted on 08/23/2005 1:35:14 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

He was not in custody, per se, this is not a law enforcement issue. This was a private company subduing and recovering stolen property waiting on LEO to arrive at the scene. Now, if LEO had held this guy down on the pavement for 20 minutes that would be a different story.


169 posted on 08/23/2005 1:43:04 PM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson