Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: auntyfemenist

"Can someone please explain to me why we don't put people on trial for treason anymore???"

I'll try...

Since the advent of the Viet Nam "syndrome," which has never disappeared but has become an axiom, it is now "patriotic" to denigrate America. According to liberals, who babble ad infinitum about how much they "love" their country, America is responsible for every conceivable ill in the world, became wealthy and powerful because we stole from everyone else, (not because we're free), and is led by a radical right-wing, war mongering, Nazi imperialist named Bush.

To the left, the paragon of patriotism is embodied in the previous president, who dodged the draft, gave nuclear secrets to the Red Chinese, bombed the Balkans for no reason other than someone named Monica, favored unlimited abortion, issued lots of un-constitutional and anti-private property executive orders, appointed plenty of activist judges who deliberately undermine the constitution, pardoned real traitors, ignored terrorist attacks (like WTC-1), and neglected our military and intelligence communities so badly as to leave us wide open to huge terror threats (like WTC-2).

Therefore, in comparison to that REAL patriot, ANYTHING negative one says about America is "patriotic" and one can't arrest all of these "true patriots" for treason - or the left would go insane hollering about how all of their freedom of speech is being denied.

I'll add that if this definition of patriotism was our guiding light during World War II, we'd now be speaking German; or Japanese.

- knightshadow.


132 posted on 08/23/2005 10:30:07 AM PDT by knightshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: knightshadow
I was hoping the most obvious answer was not true. However, I have seen some behavior that really is treasonous, not just some liberal whining but actually giving aid and comfort to the enemy. I can't fathom why speech designed to aid our enemies is untouchable. Under those standards, anyone who could remember the classified documents they saw, and dictate them back to the enemy, could claim free speech.

That was a great answer, I was just hoping there was more hope than that.
253 posted on 08/24/2005 9:40:53 AM PDT by auntyfemenist (Show me your papers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson