LOL... which press... the Enquirer?
In all seriousness, I think the real lesson here is that all of us parents have to teach our children that sexual activity (of ANY kind) can have very serious consequences -- for both males and females. That may be one good argument for saving it for marriage, but regardless, it is not something to be engaged in lightly, without careful forethought and consideration.
Obviously, neither is sperm/egg donation, even if it is without the umm... recreational benefits.
I read about the court case here on FR.
I agree about the need to understand that sex is not a strictly recreational exercise, especially outside of marriage.
I just don't know that I agree that the woman (who has no responsibility to prove the appropriate use of the money) should be allowed to hand the man a bill for support in all circumstances. Again, I haven't had time to think about it - I'm trying to be a productive member of society at work, currently! ;-P
Have a good day!