Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Puddleglum
”Well good. Reproduction entails responsibility.”

Apparently not for the woman in making a reproduction contract. After all, it’s her rather than the kids that is now trying to break it.

I think this is absurd. Using the same logic, every sperm bank donor would be responsible for some unknown number of children. Maybe the kids could get together and sue for reparations:^)

10 posted on 08/23/2005 4:52:32 AM PDT by elfman2 (2 tacos short of a combination plate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: elfman2
Using the same logic, every sperm bank donor would be responsible for some unknown number of children

Exactly. That's why I called it fast-food fertility. Donors to sperm banks know their sperm is intended to create children. They are knowingly entering into the business of parenthood.

50 posted on 08/23/2005 6:21:08 AM PDT by Puddleglum (Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson