Well you know what siteTEST?, you are disingenuous. You are not being honest. I asked you AT LEAST two days ago to give me your interpretation of what tax policy the fed gov should follow and you have done nothing of the kind. The only fact I can take away from that is that you have no alternative to current tax policy. If that is the case why are you on this board other than to promote your government control over our lives.
I've already posted a smattering of actual financial results from major corporations that support my assertion that the amount of federal corpor
Please. Don't bore us all with the status quo. JUST GIVE US A TAX POLICY THAT WE CAN ALL LIVE WITH. AND DON'T BASE IT UPON YOUR INCOME OR LIVELYHOOD.
Dear groanup,
"I asked you AT LEAST two days ago to give me your interpretation of what tax policy the fed gov should follow and you have done nothing of the kind."
I certainly have, and I'm perfectly willing to continue discussing what I think our tax policies should be.
After you reclaim some intellectual integrity.
Either repudiate pigdog's false posts (which have been going on for longer than two days) that are now asserting that corporations, on average, are sending 11% of their revenues to the government in the form of federal corporate income taxes, or prove them to be true yourself.
How much there is to be saved by eliminating the federal corporate income tax is a critical issue. If we really could recapture and save at the retail level 11% from just one level, that would be grand!
Heck, if you can demonstrate the claim, I'd be a lot more inclined to the NSRT, myself.
But the very fact that you can't demonstrate it, because it just isn't true, is part of the reason for my opposition.
If you can't come clean on it, there is no point in discussing what are the alternatives to the NSRT.
sitetest