So really what you're saying is that this whole bit of trivia from you about what Dr. J. said and/or meant is entirely your own supposition. since you can't show a single instance of such a direct, unequivocal statement.
With that being the case and since my interpretations are at least as good as yours, I believe just the opposite. None of the statements you keep putting forth stand on their own and you continually spin them to your own ends, Why don't you, instead, look at the overall result of his work and the model's projections which are presented in many places?
Are you concerned that some might not buy into your beliefs??? You've certainly got reason for that, I'd say.
I would wager any amount of money that my interpretaion is correct.