Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobFromGa

"That is a pretty ridiculous statement, it may be complex but people do understand it, and in fact become expert at it esp within their own little niches."

Oh, is it ridiculous? Please explain the following results, then. Money magazine used to do a test of the income tax system. They sent the same set of fictitious tax input data to professional tax preparers all over the country and requested that they fill out 1040s based on that info. The last time they did that was for tax year 1996 (if memory serves), with results published in March 97. They recived 47 different tax returns complete by 47 different professional tax preparers and they recieved 47 different answers back. They weren't off by a few dollars - they were wildly different. That year was only slightly higher than the norm for the results they recorded during the 10-12 years they did the test.

The tax system is far more complex now than was the case for 1996. Unfortunately, Money no longer does that test. I guess they felt they had proven their point. Apparently, there are a few unconvinced diehards.

As far as your contention that people become experts at it within their own niches, it wasn't clear if you were referring to tax professionals or business people. If you were referring to business people, are you saying that business decisions should be dictated by the necessity of staying in their tax "niches"? If you were referring to tax preparers, does that mean you have to use multiple tax preparers as your business grows, who are specialized in the various areas of the Code that your business takes you into? Actually, that is what happens to a certain extent when you use the more sophisticated regional or national CPA firms. What a collossal waste of human resource!!


187 posted on 08/23/2005 1:46:18 PM PDT by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: phil_will1
Oh, is it ridiculous? Please explain the following results, then. Money magazine used to do a test of the income tax system. They sent the same set of fictitious tax input data to professional tax preparers all over the country and requested that they fill out 1040s based on that info. The last time they did that was for tax year 1996 (if memory serves), with results published in March 97. They recived 47 different tax returns complete by 47 different professional tax preparers and they recieved 47 different answers back. They weren't off by a few dollars - they were wildly different. That year was only slightly higher than the norm for the results they recorded during the 10-12 years they did the test.

Most of them were off by a few dollars, a few were wildly different. There are incompetent and dishonest people and in any business, tax preparation is no different. And Free Republic is no different.

By niches, I meant to imply business scenarios like equipment depreciation, or real estate transactions, etc. Yes the tax code has many little hooks and loopholes in it that people learn about over time. I agree it is too complex, and that it must be simplified.

190 posted on 08/23/2005 1:53:02 PM PDT by RobFromGa (Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran-- what are we waiting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

To: phil_will1
The income tax code should be required reading for its present defenders. They should then read the Fair Tax bill and compare the difference. I defy any one who defends the income tax to explain to me in plain business level English how to figure it out.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
341 posted on 08/23/2005 11:21:07 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson