Yes, exactly. But it should have been thrown out completely.
Had they refused to give him gas, I am sure he could have come up with some kind of suit against them.
Besides, I am a firm beliver in personal responsibility. This idea of blaming some one else is B.S.
The guy must not have insurance to go after so they find the deepest pockets they can.
I feel for the victims, but let's put the responsibility where it should.
Absolutely right.
What if he then ran out of gas and was injured or killed on the highway, or what if he left his car at the station and subsequently was hurt?
With these kinds of idiotic rulings, you're screwed no matter what you do.