Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charlesj

You left out the part where there are two sources that new laws must be checked out against... Islamic Law and Democratic principles/human rights.

Also, the Islamic principles the vague language they used leaves a lot of room for interpretation.


6 posted on 08/22/2005 11:20:19 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coconutt2000
I agree. I am not really that upset about this at this point. Our laws are based on Christian/Jewish laws. That doesn't mean that we are a theocracy. So why should the Iraqi constitution not reflect the basic principles of the primary religion of the region.

As long as they do not impinge upon the belief system of others in the country, and it is very broad language I think it is ok. As with our country, it will be the interpretation that will be vital. Think we'll see huge "supreme court" fights in Iraq in the future?
52 posted on 08/22/2005 11:56:03 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson