I didn't think so.
How then do you think they can resolve mutually exclusive claims regarding the Constitution? After all, the application of law in a 'rule of law' context is definative, while the practice of sharia is somewhat subjective.
Are you suggesting this nod to sharia is camoflage, or perhaps something else?
I can't say what it is, only what I hope. I hope they lay down basic law protecting the rights of women and minorities so that (for lack of a better word, I apologize) assh*le Muslim fundamentalists will be restrained in their wild, human-rights violating interpretations as they use the Quran to build their Islamic laws on top of that human rights base.