Skip to comments.
Study: California loses millions on out-of-state films
AP ^
| 8-22-05
Posted on 08/22/2005 5:38:11 AM PDT by Hadean
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Bush's fault.
1
posted on
08/22/2005 5:38:12 AM PDT
by
Hadean
To: Hadean
What do they expect? Union's drive up the cost of production, and not everybody in the rest of the US speaks with a Spanish accent..............
2
posted on
08/22/2005 5:48:48 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Want to be surprised? GOOOOGLE your own name. Want to have fun? GOOOOGLE your neighbor's......)
To: Hadean
...according to a study to be released Monday.
(actual study produced in Toronto, Canada)
3
posted on
08/22/2005 5:50:57 AM PDT
by
motzman
(It's obvious to everyone now--Bill Clinton is an absolute disgrace.)
To: Hadean
All I can say is duh...
You make it expensive to work here by punishing employers with high taxes and outrageous workman's comp payments and employers leave and hire people elsewhere.
4
posted on
08/22/2005 5:52:35 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: Red Badger
I'd guess the state/city is a bigger cost factor than the unions.
5
posted on
08/22/2005 5:53:24 AM PDT
by
DB
(©)
To: Hadean
The state, for example, loses more than $10 million when a $70 million movie is made outside the state, and $3 million for a 12-episode drama, the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp. said. Uhhh and the other states? How much do they lose when a film is made in California? How can anybody lose what is not rightfully theirs to begin with? As far as I know, movie making is legal everywhere in the US excepting AREA 51.
To: motzman
(actual study produced in Toronto, Canada) LOL
7
posted on
08/22/2005 6:00:52 AM PDT
by
11Bush
(No outstanding felonies, but my life has been one long misdemeanor.)
To: Carry_Okie; calcowgirl; SierraWasp; EveningStar
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a former actor, is pushing the legislation that would provide a 12 percent tax credit on a feature film's spending, with a cap of $3 million per production. Television movies could get an additional 3 percent credit.Interesting.
8
posted on
08/22/2005 6:02:29 AM PDT
by
FOG724
(RINOS - they are not better than leftists, they ARE leftists.)
To: Hadean
"Study: California loses millions on out-of-state films"
Would someone out there in Freeper-land explain to me just how in the hell California can lose something they never had. IMNOHO, they didn't "lose" the money, they screwed themselves out of the ADDTIONAL tax money by making it cheaper for the movie industry to make movies elsewhere. What it comes down to is, California is succeeding in doing something that the left has dreamed of for years. TAX THE EVIL CORPORATIONS OUT OF BUSINESS. (or out of the state)
9
posted on
08/22/2005 6:03:50 AM PDT
by
Bar-Face
To: Hadean
Another union gripe. Since WalMart isn't directly involved in the film industry the unions in that industry have to find something to gripe about. Between new zealand and canada the us as a whole loses.
10
posted on
08/22/2005 6:05:29 AM PDT
by
Mrs. Shawnlaw
(Rock beats scissors. Don't run with rocks. NRA)
To: Bar-Face
They're doing it in MA too (consumers). Tax hell and high water when all most have to do is take a 1/2 drive to NH to get around it. It has really ticked off a lot of small businesses near the entire state line.
11
posted on
08/22/2005 6:11:23 AM PDT
by
Hadean
To: Mrs. Shawnlaw
How absurd. No hope for out-of-state expenditures= nothing lost. Go outside and play.
12
posted on
08/22/2005 6:12:48 AM PDT
by
CBart95
To: Hadean
"What this really comes down to is - are we willing to make a bit of a sacrifice to generate more middle-class jobs here in California?" he said. "This is not a tax credit bill for the big movie studios, but for those that operate on the margins." I love this. A typical nitwit Democrat. Create a high-tax regime that drives business out of state, then try lure some of it back by giving breaks only to those industries the Legislature thinks are "cool". California can't survive with nothing but software companies and filmmakers - some of those icky, polluting farmers and manufacturers will be neccessary, too. ;)
13
posted on
08/22/2005 6:17:29 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Feelings are not a tool of cognition, therefore they are not a criterion of morality." -- Ayn Rand)
To: Hadean
Well maybe if you'd gag a few of your 'stars' such as babs the mouth; alex, the idiot, has he left yet??? maybe you have better times, but as long as your 'stars' are all mouth, NO we don't buy it....
14
posted on
08/22/2005 6:23:27 AM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(My ? to libs: "Do they ever shut up on your planet?" "Grow your own DOPE: Plant a LIB!")
To: RGSpincich; Ultra Sonic 007
Exactly!
The state, for example, loses more than $10 million when a $70 million movie is made outside the state
This from the same type of people that think tax cuts mean that the government is giving money away....it shows a lack of critical thought on behalf of the liberals. Typical.
15
posted on
08/22/2005 6:33:30 AM PDT
by
ImaGraftedBranch
(God is my Fulcrum; prayer is my lever -- Saint Therese of Lisieux)
To: ImaGraftedBranch
Lets put a $2.00 tax per ticket for re-training and help for those in the industry.
That is what they say we need to do for everyone else.
16
posted on
08/22/2005 6:51:42 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Hadean
It's not just taxes driving productions out of the state, it's the fees for permits charged by the cities the movies are filmed in - you don't see many movies filmed on the streets of San Francisco, because the city soaks the movie makers for millions and millions and millions - this was a news story ten years ago, and it has'nt gotten better. That's why so many movies are now shot overseas, or in Canada, or in smaller cities.
17
posted on
08/22/2005 6:55:06 AM PDT
by
ByDesign
To: ImaGraftedBranch
Now now, play nice. The liberals don't know any better.
18
posted on
08/22/2005 7:17:54 AM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(DON'T LET THE LEFT GET YOU!)
To: Hadean
The findings come as lawmakers are proposing legislation to offer tax breaks to encourage producers to continue shooting films, television shows and commercials in the state. Many states offer tax breaks to the movie industry. California is only trying to keep up.
19
posted on
08/22/2005 7:30:35 AM PDT
by
Between the Lines
(Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
To: Hadean
Well, I lost millions of dollars because the New York Giants decided to sign a guy who played football much better than I did. And those darn New York Mets signed a guy who could hit a ball farther than me. Lost millions there too. I guess they were just looking for value for their money. Go figure.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson