Not really. ID is trying to prove a negative ("certain features could not have arisen naturally"). That is a logical impossibility.
Not really. ID is trying to prove a negative ("certain features could not have arisen naturally"). That is a logical impossibility.
The only thing ID is really trying to do is tarnish TOE sufficiently to get politicians to open the doors to stealth teaching of you know what in public schools.
I can just picture an ID "teacher" nodding his/her head and saying "Absolutely" when a student asks, "Could the Intelligent Designer be a space alien?".