Yes, I caught that. And, you still have no clue as to what concept of the depths behind the events I understand. And, since the Scripture is supposedly understandable by any layman reader, my understanding of the spirit behind the writing is as valid as yours or anyone else's, for that matter. Unless you are making the case that it takes special training, indeed a priestly knowledge, to "understand the spirit behind the words."
Now, we've pretty much determined on these threads that interpretation of Scripture is purely subjective. Unless you have some way to objectify your "understanding of the spirit behind the words" methinks my interpretation thereof is the proper one.
>> Now, we've pretty much determined on these threads that interpretation of Scripture is purely subjective<<
Interpretation is subjective. So true. The scripture itself, however, is not. And just because there are 42 different opinions, and therefore at least 41 are wrong, it does not follow logically that all 42 must be wrong.
Time will tell, of course.