Does this mean "his full set" of all the documents are now missing from where he keeped them at the DIA?
I was wondering the same thing. I assume that if he had no idea where to locate a full set of documents, he would have said so.
" I was wondering the same thing. I assume that if he had no idea where to locate a full set of documents, he would have said so."
Exactly. The wording in this article is hard to follow. It just does not seem to reflect the facts, as we would assume
where meant to be delinated in this article.
Put it in Clinton terms prior to Monica's dress. Clinton reasoned that there was no way Monica could prove he had sex with her. There were no witnesses and what were the odds she had a dress with his semen on it... He figured slim and none. So he denied it.
Then came the zinger that She had saved the Dress to protect herself.
Consider the Able Danger guys who want the story out. The first task is to convince the Clintonistas that the whistle blowers have no proof.. That the Clinton gang has destroyed all proof. In other words all dresses have been drycleaned.
But what if everything has not been destroyed? What course of action will they follow. What will the guilty parties believe. What they believe is most likely will determine their defense.
It seems to me the Able Danger people are setting a trap. They put out conficting information.. and then reverse that information.
That leaves the guilty parties two options... confess and take the consequences, or lie and hope to get away with it. The object of those on offense is to get them to lie and get caught. That takes disinformation and results in the defenders taking a gamble... that they will lose.