Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Glenmerle
Just one fact alone--that he took for himself the ability to forgive sins committed by one man against another--tells you he was either who he said he was or a nut.

Logical fallacy of false dilemma. Third option: those who wrote of him long after his death ascribed to him things he did not say or do.

19 posted on 08/21/2005 10:54:05 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
Bill Craig has added legend to CSL's famous trillema, lord, liar, lunatic.

1. Lord
2. Liar
3. Lunatic
4. Legend
38 posted on 08/21/2005 12:35:49 PM PDT by bethelgrad (for God, country, the Marine Corps, and now the Navy Chaplain Corps OOH RAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: antiRepublicrat
Logical fallacy of false dilemma. Third option: those who wrote of him long after his death ascribed to him things he did not say or do.

Not quite. I wasn't discussing the possibility of a third option having merit -- with you or with anyone else. (Neither, in fact, was C.S. Lewis.) I was discussing Goldie Hawn's perception of Jesus as illustrated by her comments in the article. Notice that she says "when [Jesus] went to the desert" -- when, not if. She's not debating whether someone invented the story of Jesus' sojourn in the desert, she's simply interpreting the story in a nonsensical way.

C.S. Lewis's point was that people will read -- and believe -- the words attributed to Jesus in the gospels but then completely miss their significance. They believe he said he was able to forgive sins, but at the same time they say he was nothing more than a wise man. Hence the poached egg problem.

53 posted on 08/21/2005 9:12:36 PM PDT by Glenmerle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson