Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius
I'd dispute the notion that reading the congressional debates is "absolute key" to understanding the 14th amendment. Mostly what you'd need to read is Section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (see #25 on this thread). That provides pretty much the entire context necessary for Section 1 of the 14th amendment. Everything else is really just icing on the cake.
140 posted on 08/25/2005 6:43:08 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: inquest

I agree that the 14th Amendment was ratified in order to constitutionalize the Civil Rights Act, but that is made quite clear in both the debates surrounding the adoption of the 14th Amendment and to some extent in the passage of the Civil Rights Act itself, the constitutionality of which was debated extensively.


141 posted on 08/25/2005 9:31:05 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson