Skip to comments.
Bush keeps S.F. at bay
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 8/21/5
| Marc Sandalow
Posted on 08/20/2005 11:36:04 PM PDT by SmithL
President not expected to return to city after 5-year absence on upcoming trip to California.
Washington -- Presidential visits to San Francisco have been a tradition since Rutherford Hayes lunched at the Cliff House in 1880.
Presidents arrived by stagecoach and jet. One was shot at. Another died. In all, 20 presidents have visited the city, including every chief executive for the past 75 years.
Except George W. Bush.
Now in the fifth year of his presidency, Bush has yet to set a foot in the city that was home to his childhood baseball idol, Willie Mays, and shows no inclination to do so. The White House is planning a California visit by the end of the month, and San Francisco is not on the itinerary.
San Francisco, with roughly three-quarters of a million residents, is the only city among the nation's 25 largest that has not been host for a Bush presidential visit. If he avoids San Francisco for the rest of his term, he will be the first president not to visit since Calvin Coolidge, and only the second in more than a century.
The reason seems plain to even casual observers of American politics.
San Francisco is as politically, culturally and geographically distant from the president as anyplace in America. Eighty-four percent of the city's voters cast ballots against Bush in 2000, and 85 percent voted against him in 2004. The city has voted Democratic in 12 consecutive presidential elections.
"He'd be crazy to come,"
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: baghdadbythebay; bush43; pervertcity; president; sanctuaryfrancisco; sf; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
1
posted on
08/20/2005 11:36:05 PM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Why the hell would he want to go to San Fran> Hell, why would anyone?
2
posted on
08/20/2005 11:39:19 PM PDT
by
Hexenhammer
(Sheehan: we damand the truth, post the picture you damned hippie fraud)
To: SmithL
SF is an enemy to Bush. He would only receive hostility and contempt if he were to visit.
Anyone have any information about SF's declaring itself a military free city? As well as the airport, SFO?
3
posted on
08/20/2005 11:40:44 PM PDT
by
ArmyTeach
(Not on my watch!)
To: SmithL
He should come to San Diego. Reagan's lucky city!
To: SmithL
One was shot at. Another died.*scratches head* I wonder what reason he could possibly have for not wanting to go there....
5
posted on
08/20/2005 11:42:08 PM PDT
by
Phantasy
To: SmithL

Bush hasn't visited Pyongyang during his presidency, either, S.F. Chronicle, but you don't see anybody scratching their heads and wondering why.
-Dan
6
posted on
08/20/2005 11:42:16 PM PDT
by
Flux Capacitor
(Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
To: Phantasy

Harding wasn't even the victim of violence. All he had to do was hang around in San Fran for a while, and
*pfft*, he keeled over dead. :)
-Dan
7
posted on
08/20/2005 11:45:15 PM PDT
by
Flux Capacitor
(Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
To: SmithL
Well, it would not be right to place the President into a known seismic zone - there are enough other worries as it already is. So let the Gomorrah have its Big One - and he could visit later.
8
posted on
08/20/2005 11:46:43 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Flux Capacitor
Hmm. I think I've decided where NOT to go on my next vacation.
9
posted on
08/20/2005 11:46:45 PM PDT
by
Phantasy
To: SmithL
is the only city among the nation's 25 largest that has not been host for a Bush presidential visit. If he avoids San Francisco for the rest of his term, he will be the first president not to visit since Calvin Coolidge, and only the second in more than a century. Since when is the city of San Francisco entitled to be visited by any President.
What the hell is so important about that "Sodom" of a city?
BTW if you can imagine the city without the people, it is beautiful...
10
posted on
08/20/2005 11:47:16 PM PDT
by
danmar
("No person is so grand or wise or perfect as to be the master of another person." Karl Hess)
To: ArmyTeach
receive hostility and contempt And given San Francisco's voting record, he would probably return the same sentiments.
11
posted on
08/20/2005 11:50:26 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: Flux Capacitor
and *pfft*, he keeled over dead. :) is "pfft" a gay fart?
12
posted on
08/20/2005 11:50:46 PM PDT
by
digger48
To: Hexenhammer
Why the hell would he want to go to San Fran> Hell, why would anyone?Dinner at Fisherman's Wharf?
13
posted on
08/20/2005 11:57:29 PM PDT
by
Racehorse
(Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
To: Racehorse
14
posted on
08/20/2005 11:59:21 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(1-866-DHS-2ICE.-Toll free and anonymous. Report illegal aliens and those who hire them.)
To: SmithL
Wait til Karl Rove has his way with SF and triggers "the big one". It will be "Karl's Fault".
15
posted on
08/20/2005 11:59:24 PM PDT
by
dc-zoo
To: SmithL
Your can take this two ways:
First, President Bush isn't dumb enough to place himself in the middle of what would undoubtedly be a massive left wing demonstration and a marvelous propaganda opportunity for his political opponents, including the management and staff of the San Francisco Chronicle, and this fact frustrates them to no end.
Second, President Bush DID visit a defense plant in San Jose during his first term. Maybe the folks at the Chron are beginning to worry that San Francisco, which contributes very little to the American economy beyond law suits, mortgage loans and tourist snapshots just isn't very important in the national scheme of things. This fact no doubt has some people who think of San Francisco as the center of the universe twitching with jealousy.
16
posted on
08/21/2005 12:05:34 AM PDT
by
InABunkerUnderSF
(San Francisco - See It Before God Smites It.)
To: Racehorse
Don't forget to visit the USS Pampanito. It's very worthwhile.
17
posted on
08/21/2005 12:07:01 AM PDT
by
SmithL
(There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
To: SmithL
On my visit to SF last year I was amazed at all the homeless panhandlers. It was a beautiful city, but I didn't see so many homeless beggars in any of the other American cities I visited. I thought it was kind of sad that a city so rich couldn't take care of its own people.
To: ArmyTeach
They didn't want a heroic battleship with all its great memories. Why would they want a competent president? Send them Clinton and Carter. Or Kerry and Dean. Or Cindy.
And plenty of pot for them.
19
posted on
08/21/2005 12:12:02 AM PDT
by
sine_nomine
(Protect the weakest of the weak - the unborn babies.)
To: Hexenhammer
He probably does not want to go because he loves his lovely wife and does not want to meet a bunch of those guys that like guys.
20
posted on
08/21/2005 12:18:21 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson