[PatrickHenry]

But the fact that you can't demonstrate evolution of body types etc. is evidence. It is not supporting evidence. It is a lack of supporting evidence -- you wish you could fill the gap but you can't. The fact that evolutionists refuse to admit this is just as stupid as anything the creationists have ever said. You have fallen to the level of those you hate.

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution. Yes, macro-evolution.
Ichneumon's legendary post 52. More evidence than you can handle.
Post 661: Ichneumon's stunning post on transitionals.
Evidence of Evolutionary Transitions. There really is evidence out there.
Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ. Yes, transitional fossils exist.
Fossil whale with legs. Land animal to whale transitional fossil.
Feathered Dinosaurs.
Archaeopteryx. Reptile-to- bird transitional fossil.
Archaeopteryx: FAQS . A true transitional fossil
All About Archaeopteryx.
Evidence for Evolution . Compilation of links.
Human Ancestors.
The Evidence for Human Evolution.
Comparison of all Hominid skulls.

[Rippin]

VV: What facts are we missing?

Rippin: Evolutionists have never observed their mechanism actually do very much.

VV: Begs the question, refuses to admit that failure to observe the mechanism in action at a macro-level is a weakness in the theory.

Rippin: Points out the failure to follow the logic trail.

Patrick Henry: Links that fail to address the point under consideration.

Rippin: For PH, do you admit that the fact that we have not observed the assumed mechanisms for evolution produce macro level changes is a weakness in the the theory of orthodox neo-Darwinism?