Would you say that these headlines are basically what the arguement boils down to?
Nothing Creates Universe, Wins Lotto, Universe is Special
Or:
Something Creates Universe, Uses Choice to Make Universe Special
Would you say that these headlines are basically what the arguement boils down to? Nothing Creates Universe, Wins Lotto, Universe is Special Or: Something Creates Universe, Uses Choice to Make Universe Special
No. That is what you and countless creationists would very much like it to boil down to, so you can engage in this loony science-by-sheer-logic rhetoric, that was so popular in the 13th century, and which you've recently grown so fond of.
Serious science is not interested in this argument, because it's outside science's sphere of competence. Science is interested in mundane material explanations of material phenomena, and has no useful, or particularly competent, opinions about additional metaphysical explanations beyond that.