[Thatcherite]

It is really sad when Freepers get so desperate to bolster their religious faith that they have to make up fantasy friends. Or perhaps you'd care to supply the name of next-year's Nobel Prize Winner for the biological sciences? Because a world-leading biologist who could point at evidence that undermines the untold millions of data-points that match the predictions of modern biology's central and overarching concept, the theory of evolution would win the Nobel Prize without delay.

[Timmy]

Well, actually I'm not a liar. And you result to name-calling quite quickly with zero evidence. John Kerry supporter, I s'pose? Perhaps camping with Mother Sheehan? At least, you seem to act like those folks.

I don't use my friend's name because I don't have his permission (I haven't, and won't, ask for it for this silly little chat). It's called courtesy, something you folks on the left ought to practice.

But his name doesn't matter. There are many distinguished scientists who have stepped up and criticized Darwinism. Many of the critics (Wells, Behe, Denton) have extensive science-related acronyms following their names. However, to those like you, they are simply morons. Which is why I challenge you angry evos (and you are one) to declare your background and education. It provides perspective to how you examine the evidence.

I freely admit I'm an engineer. You may be a professor of biological science, or perhaps a scientologist. Don't you agree it's helpful? I would hate to think that you might be a truck driver calling distinguished science PhD's morons because they dare to doubt you on this subject. However, I am quite certain that would be the result, which is why you prefer to insult, rather than stepping up to the plate.

Toodles, my friend. I will await your next nasty comment. It is, after all, what you do best.