Replies

You and your ilk are just too darn smart for me. But I'll tell you what. I live in a university town. And a friend of mine is one of the leading biological scientists in the nation (maybe, the world). He is quite well-known among those who do that sort of thing for his work in genetics, having had at least one famous break-through (maybe more, but you understand that stuff is way beyond morons like me). Oh, and did I mention he doesn't believe in evolution? Just another moron after all. BTW, what is YOUR background in natural science?

I have at least a vague familiarity, and I don't offer up ghost cites from imaginary friends as if it were evidence.

Sigh. Don't know why I bother. Jonathan Wells and Michael Behe have PhD's in moledular biology. Many other critics have similar background. Even Stephen Jay Gould admitted the fossil record didn't support Darwinism (ever hear of punctuated equilibrium?). But all these folks are stupid compared to donH, Patrick Henry, and VadeRetro, none of whom will stand up and state their qualifications to call someone else ignorant in how they evaluate the arguments for and against. It's like arguing with liberals. Ugliness, insults and name-calling is all you've got.