So... Are you implying that my arguments fall into these categories? That would be about "par for the course" with your ilk.
"In my opinion, the Endogenous Retro Virus insertions that are common between primates and humans is the smoking gun that shows common ancestry. Arguing against it is like arguing for a flat earth."
And that is obviously your opinion. Problem for you is that the word "theory" keeps popping up. And that one little word plainly means that Evolution is still officially considered a "theory" in the scientific circles. And the fact that you are all hot to desperately make it "fact" and remain upset about one theory being taught over another theory shows exactly where your head and your opinions stand...
All you have in natural sciences are theories. There's no promotion from "theory" to fact. It is still the theory of gravity, the theory of molar equivalence, and the theory of plate tectonics.