[dsc]

"and justified."

Only by prejudice.

ID doesn't deny the factuality of evolution. There is no dispute at all until you get to the final question, "Did it all happen by accident, or was there an Intelligence behind it?"

Either answer rests on religious and not scientific grounds.

[spinestein]

[ID doesn't deny the factuality of evolution. There is no dispute at all until you get to the final question, "Did it all happen by accident, or was there an Intelligence behind it?"]


Then why are the ID supporters all demanding equal time to teach their competing theory? Why are the ID supporters in this crevo debate all ripping on evolution?

If "ID doesn't deny the factuality of evolution", then its supporters wouldn't have any complaints about what is taught in public schools.

And if the only difference is "the final question, ...was there an Intelligence [God] behind it?", then ID's supporters can only be talking about religion (as you admit) and as such it absolutely has no place in a science classroom.