Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
I read this exact article 6 month ago, even the title of the article is the same. The writer stating that because the tax dollars are not being spent in a major urban city, the tax money should not be spent at all.

Those 14,000 people are taxpayers, they should get their bridge.

11 posted on 08/20/2005 4:55:08 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paul C. Jesup
Those 14,000 people are taxpayers, they should get their bridge.

I have an idea: The people who live in Alaska and are going to be using the bridge can pay for it.

Likewise, those living in New York can pay for their bridges; those living in Kansas can pay for theirs; and so on. Why must the federal government pay for everything?

15 posted on 08/20/2005 5:04:28 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson