Skip to comments.
Pleistocene Park? On the reintroduction of species
NewScientist.com ^
| 17 August 2005
| Kurt Kleiner
Posted on 08/20/2005 2:15:44 PM PDT by sociotard
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: sociotard
recreate North American landscapes
It would also help preserve wildlife that faces the threat of extinction in Africa and Asia
Doesn't both Asia and Afric have more land than North America? So, why not put the preserve in on one of those? [Answer: The envirwackos have no influence in Asia or Africa, and Europe is too crowded already.]
21
posted on
08/20/2005 3:07:57 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: sociotard
"Eventually, the animals could roam in preserves hundreds of thousands of hectares in size. The best place to create this Pleistocene Park would be in the North American Great Plains, where the human population is relatively low and the grazing animals would have a ready supply of food." Uh, I think those "hundreds of thousands of hectares" still belong to people, despite the fact that the "human population is relatively low".
Now we know the REAL reason behind the Supreme Court's "eminent domain" decision.
To: RedMonqey
Dont cha love the way nature works in harmony to benefit all God's creatures? lol
23
posted on
08/20/2005 6:58:24 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Hug your babies.)
To: sociotard
Still, a 100 mile wide big game corridor from San Diego to Corpus Christi has a certain appeal...
24
posted on
08/20/2005 7:00:55 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Be vewwy vewwy qwiet, we're hunting wahabbits...)
To: sociotard
Have you noticed that anything that scientists cannot explain is said to be the doing of man, provided man was around at that time?
To: sociotard
The best place to create this Pleistocene Park would be in the North American Great Plains, I think this is an excellent idea -- although the perfect spot would be northern Long Island. Eastern Massachusetts wouldn't be bad either. Or maybe Connecticut.
26
posted on
08/21/2005 6:49:24 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: sociotard
They propose introducing the animals over 50 years, starting with horses, asses and camels, working up to elephants, and finally bringing in the big cats.As far as horses and asses are concerned, they're about five centuries late. As for camels, the llama is probably closer to anything that lived in Pleistocene America than the camels of the Old World.
28
posted on
08/14/2006 9:52:20 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
29
posted on
08/14/2006 10:03:03 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: sociotard
Could happen after the muzzies nuke most large american cities and blow up other malls, bridges and dams.... Unless Americans finally get busy.. Could happen..
30
posted on
08/14/2006 10:09:17 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
31
posted on
11/01/2013 12:00:54 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson