That's one reason why the hearings can't just focus on whether Clinton could have prevented 9-11 with this knowledge. It needs to be a wider investigation of the genesis of Wall and its effects, and whether the 9-11 Commission acted irresponsibly in not including Able Danger in its final report.
He who frames the question wins the argument.
Pinz
I agree. If Able Danger is part of 9-11, even as an addendum, it should have been included.