[Celtjew Libertarian]

There were NONE. Do not know what you remember but there was not one paper that said Gore would have won. ALL the left-wing democrat papers admitted that Bush won including USA Today, Miami, Times, and all others.

See the article I link to in post 19, 5th paragraph. They confirm Bush's victory, but note that there was one method, "advocated by many Republicans," by which Gore came out three votes ahead.

[dcar99]

Seems like I remember reading that the only way Gore could have won was counting all the overvotes as well as the undervotes and *also* assigning him votes where the voter voted strictly Democrat but then voted for Buchanon ( going back to the poorly aligned voter form issue ) which obviously never would have held up in court. There was no way Gore could have won the election.

[YOUGOTIT]

You said "Look at Paragraph 5 in you post, I did: Ain't NO way. I was then and still am a Florida Republican and I can remember no one asking for that. This is another lie by the left-wing anti-American Press.

[ArmstedFragg]

The method "advocated by Republicans" involved counting the over-votes. The "advocacy" was more along the lines of trying to draw a comparison between absurdities by saying, "if you're going to count the under-votes, why not count the over-votes too?" In oral arguments before the Supreme Court, the Gore side was asked this question and rejected the idea of counting over-votes. Ironically, that's the only way they would have won.