[NJ_gent]

"We believe God has raised up ICR to spearhead Biblical Christianity's defense against the godless and compromising dogma of evolutionary humanism. Only by showing the scientific bankruptcy of evolution, while exalting Christ and the Bible, will Christians be successful"

Until the creationist group puts forth an argument based on actual evidence, analyzed via the scientific method, and critiqued by peer review within the scientific community, "creation science" will continue to be about as real as Thor. There is no creation science because there is no science from the creationist lobby. It's fine that people want to believe something is a certain way, and it's fine that some people find words in a book to be evidence of something; it just isn't science and it never will be.

[ohioWfan]

Is "peer review" valid when your "peers" reject opposing thought out of hand?

[taxesareforever]

Unlike evolution which you must believe is fact but is without factual basis. Your argument is no argument at all considering there is no factual basis for evolution. So until you present FACTS and not THEORIES enough with your rhetoric. By the way, peer review does not establish facts.