Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petrosius
The materialistic concept of science is a metaphysical construct, not a scientific one.

That's "conception", and certainly I can agree with you that materialism is part of the metaphysical basis of science, and not a scientific conclusion. But it is in fact ingrained in the foundation and practice of science, and abandoning it would be tantamount to an overthrow of Science as established by Galileo and Newton.

285 posted on 08/19/2005 10:26:03 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: dr_lew
But [the materialistic conception of science] is in fact ingrained in the foundation and practice of science, and abandoning it would be tantamount to an overthrow of Science as established by Galileo and Newton.

Sorry for the typo, it's late. To the point, however, nonsense. As I have stated many times, science must posit a natural cause for the formation of a hypothesis. It does not require the insistence that only natural causes exist. One is a research method, the other a metaphysical assertion. Science does not equal materialism.

288 posted on 08/19/2005 10:33:01 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson