Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moral Hazard
It's a shame that biologists don't bow to religious orthodoxy apparently

Perhaps so. But perhaps a bigger shame that so many biologists cling so tenaciously to a theory based on Darwin's 19th century understanding of cellular biology...which he himself admitted would completely break down in the event of discovery of irreducible complexity. Thank God medical science didn't stop in 1859.
21 posted on 08/19/2005 10:53:28 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: silverleaf
"But perhaps a bigger shame that so many biologists cling so tenaciously to a theory based on Darwin's 19th century understanding of cellular biology..."

So they're stupid and you know better than they do?
24 posted on 08/19/2005 11:02:47 AM PDT by Moral Hazard ("Now therefore kill every male among the little ones" - Numbers 31:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: silverleaf
But perhaps a bigger shame that so many biologists cling so tenaciously to a theory based on Darwin's 19th century understanding of cellular biology...which he himself admitted would completely break down in the event of discovery of irreducible complexity.

What biologists are still doing this, and what's this about "irreducible complexity"?
36 posted on 08/19/2005 12:33:16 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson