Read the article again, it was a jury trial. I can almost 100% guarantee you it was a hispanic jury that found in their favor. Remember you dont have to have a unanimous vote in a civil proceeding. Same thing will happen over and over again as Hispanics bring their rascism, crime and corruption here.
This "Hispanic" is not racist, nor am I a corrupt criminal or a juror whose decisions are based on someone's ethnicity. Perhaps you meant to say "illegal aliens?"
We're in for it. I think we're going to lose this war.
The jurors in question are American citizens and live in the same county as where these border crossings occured.
Regardless of their race, they probably have the same issues with illegals crossing the border as anyone else in the county.
So, for them to find in favor of these illegals probably says a lot as to how extreme they considered the actions of the ranch owners.
"Remember you dont have to have a unanimous vote in a civil proceeding."
That varies from state to state. Unanimous is usually still required in most states.