Replies

December 7, 1941+64

Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

EXCERPT
COMPLETE LETTER

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Mia T
December 7, 1941+64
IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY by Mia T, 11.14.05 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

IMPERIOUS HILLARY
(THE REPORTS OF HER DEATH ARE GREATLY UNDERSTATED)

REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor₂

SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

for the birds
(THE INCOMPETENCE OF HILLARY CLINTON)

HEAR CHRIS MATTHEWS + MAUREEN DOWD DEVOUR HILLARY

THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)

clintonCORRUPTION: the more things change. . . .

Yitzhak Shamir Validated: THE CLINTONS ARE "A GREAT DANGER TO JEWS"

CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES₅

A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA

KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE

HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY

HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes

retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue

HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)

the clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich

CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN

hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")

NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY

BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE

PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t

CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS PARDONING CROOKS:
Justice Undone in the clinton White House

Reading and clicking, reading and clicking, reading and clicking, and bumping ;o)

As time passes and current events unfold, the ramifications of the past actions or inactions, directly and indirectly attributable to the Clinton syndicate's failure to reign in terror, grows exponentially. But it's much worse than that, because there are large numbers of enablers on both sides of the aisle, currently employed in all three branches of government, their hands long past stained with the blood of US Citizens, actively working against our Constitution and it's people.

Your warnings, in near thesis format, remind us of this.

Question(s)

Re: the Declassified State Dept. White Papers; there are some sections with the following description: [ 1.4 (c) ] and [ 1.4 (c)(d) ] Is that redacted info. and merely an assigned paragraph number or two ?

Also in a couple of other areas, the following description is inserted; (S/NF) Does that mean; Stop/Nothing Further ?

I can't make out a word in a stamped checklist on the upper right side of the page, on the viewer's left. An [x] is in a box next to the word that I cannot make out. Above the word is another unchecked word- RELEASE, and below the word in question is the word- DENY.

The answer to my question is immaterial to the purpose of (your) displaying said documents, just curious.

The fact that the documents contain telling and damning information begs pointing out and repeating, and the dates are equally important.

A sad testament to the culpability of the Congress and, We The People, for permitting this pox to spread across our great country. An enemy within... I'm afraid this democracy is undergoing a potentially lethal metamorphosis. We were warned by our founding fathers. All is not lost, but a point of no return may be crossed if not for good citizens vigilance. You're standing your watch on the rampart, and doing it well. Keep up the good work !

Must keep reading and clicking, reading and clicking, reading and clicking, reading...